On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:08:01AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > >
> > > here 4 resources
> >
> > We already had this. This SoC has a very strange register layout. The
> > registers for the UARTs are spread around the SoC and the registers
> > are not even exclusively used for the UARTs. They have bits which are
> > also used for the timer and other stuff.
> use the device id to select the register is wrong
>
> we need to pass the register via resource (without request) or platform data
> >
> > > > +static int clps711x_tstc(struct console_device *cdev)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return !(readl(SYSFLG(cdev->dev->id)) & SYSFLG_URXFE);
> > > factorise those pull status as
> > >
> > > status int xxx(data, mask) {}
> >
> > I don'r understand this. This is a single register read, there's not
> > much to factorize and the code is easy to read.
> he use the code at a least 2 place
Testing for a bit like above is done a thousand times all around the
kernel and barebox. There is nothing to factorize. The way Alexander did
it is perfectly fine.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
