On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:30:40AM +0200, Teresa Gamez wrote:
> Am 12.10.2012 09:58, schrieb Sascha Hauer:
>
> Hello Sascha,
>
> >Nice work. As Jean Christophe already mentioned, it would be nice to
> >skip the base address. That would mean to have a omap_add_mmc() function
> >like above in an omap generic place and then:
> >
> >static inline struct device_d omap<x>_add_mmc<y>(void *pdata)
> >{
> > omap_add_mmc(OMAPx_MMCy_BASE, pdata);
> >}
> >
> >in omap3/4 specific include files.
> >
> >Let me know if you want to work on this, otherwise I'm also happy to
> >apply this one as it's already a step forward.
> I will change it as you suggested.
> I would base my rework on next so I can apply the changes also on
> the archosg9 board.
Ok, thanks
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
