2012/9/14 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On 10:47 Fri 14 Sep , Franck Jullien wrote: >> >> 2012/9/14 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> > >> > On 09:25 Fri 14 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:22:07AM +0200, Franck Jullien wrote: >> >> > 2012/9/14 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> >> > > Hi Franck, >> >> > > >> >> > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 02:13:29PM +0200, Franck Jullien wrote: >> >> > >> *** Did not send this email with git because it's no working where I am ** >> >> > >> >> >> > >> We may have some disk with MBR as a first sector. In this case, the >> >> > >> current FAT check returns an error. However, the FAT sector exist and >> >> > >> the MBR can tell us where it is. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> This patch make the FAT fs try to find the FAT boot sector on the first >> >> > >> sector of the first partition in case it is not on sector 0. >> >> > > >> >> > > The patch looks good. Not applying it because it's RFC, but I would if >> >> > > you give your ok. >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > You have it. >> >> >> >> Thanks, applied >> > >> > Does this work with the fat autodetection >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > J. >> >> What do you mean ? >> >> It works when you mount your device as FAT. The FAT fs check is the >> first sector is FAT boot sector. If not, it suppose it is an MBR and >> the FAT boot sector is in the first partition. > check the the next branch > > I add the fs detection to do not specify the filesystem type anymore in mount > > Best Regards, > J. It won't. We need to check if it is an MBR here too (static int is_fat(u8 *buf)) .... _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
