On 10:47 Fri 14 Sep , Franck Jullien wrote: > > 2012/9/14 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > On 09:25 Fri 14 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:22:07AM +0200, Franck Jullien wrote: > >> > 2012/9/14 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> > > Hi Franck, > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 02:13:29PM +0200, Franck Jullien wrote: > >> > >> *** Did not send this email with git because it's no working where I am ** > >> > >> > >> > >> We may have some disk with MBR as a first sector. In this case, the > >> > >> current FAT check returns an error. However, the FAT sector exist and > >> > >> the MBR can tell us where it is. > >> > >> > >> > >> This patch make the FAT fs try to find the FAT boot sector on the first > >> > >> sector of the first partition in case it is not on sector 0. > >> > > > >> > > The patch looks good. Not applying it because it's RFC, but I would if > >> > > you give your ok. > >> > > > >> > > >> > You have it. > >> > >> Thanks, applied > > > > Does this work with the fat autodetection > > > > Best Regards, > > J. > > What do you mean ? > > It works when you mount your device as FAT. The FAT fs check is the > first sector is FAT boot sector. If not, it suppose it is an MBR and > the FAT boot sector is in the first partition. check the the next branch I add the fs detection to do not specify the filesystem type anymore in mount Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
