On 11:14 Tue 11 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:57:21AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > On 09:53 Tue 11 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 05:19:00PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > On 17:48 Tue 14 Aug , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > > export via param the phy_addr and the phy_id detected > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > this is need to fix the calao board support since the introduction of > > > > > the gigabit phy detection support > > > > > > > > can we have this as the phylib will not make it for this release > > > > > > As said to Eric in the other thread, I intend to apply: > > > > > > [PATCH 3/3] miidev: fix 1G wrong detection > > > > > > This should fix your problem here aswell, right? > > no I need the phy_addr auto detected > > Ok, but I still do not understand the following sentence from the commit > message: > > this is need to fix the calao board support since the introduction of > the gigabit phy detection support > > Hey, wait, you probably do not mean gigabit support, but the following > patch: > > | commit 1b725b9c443cd80ab4f5876a1e2c8443a24472ef > | Author: Johannes Stezenbach <js@xxxxxxxxx> > | Date: Mon Jun 18 16:47:56 2012 +0200 > | > | miidev: actually probe the PHY > | > | Check if the PHY is really accessible (e.g. the > | PHY address is correct) during probe. > | > | Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <js@xxxxxxxxx> > | Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > yes Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
