On 09:20 Thu 06 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 08:03:20PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > On 17:52 Wed 05 Sep , Jan Luebbe wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Luebbe <jlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Again NACK > > > > drop the struct XXXX on hte reg > > I also don't like it, but let's not be religious about it. > Wolfgang currently forces all people to use structs for registers. > Forcing exactly the opposite is counterproductive I think. The original > drivers uses the structs and at some point it can be useful to compare > to this driver. this is really a shit to read the code is horible So at the point we need to sync with the kernel I'm working on the amba pl180 driver currently if I use the u-boot one my board boot in 11s (just U-Boot), I re-write basing on linux I'm booting in arround 2s. So I do not see the point to share the driver with u-boot, I prefer to have a well writted one and optimised Best Regards, J. > > Sascha > > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox