Re: MLO doesn't work, rest is ok

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13:15 Wed 05 Sep     , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:01:54PM +0200, Norbert Roos wrote:
> > On 09/05/2012 12:53 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > 
> > >What gcc version do you have?
> > 
> > gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5)
> 
> Maybe you could try an older toolchain. There are some dark memories in
> my mind, but it could also be that my mind is fooling me...
> 
> > 
> > Is there something which i could quickly check in the MLO, a
> > checksum for example? Only if you know something, otherwise i can
> > look it up in the OMAP manual, what he is doing to accept the MLO.
> > 
> > As i said, it seems he doesn't like the MLO, because he's skipping
> > to the next boot source..
> 
> The MLO is generated from barebox.bin with the omap_signGP tool. It
> seems the header is 520byte in size. You could compare these between
> both images. I don't know though if this is enough for the OMAP ROM code
> to detect a valid image.
maybe too big we need to set the BAREBOX_MAX_IMAGE_SIZE
IIRC it's 54KiB

Best Regards,
J.

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux