On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:29:52PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote: > Add barebox-data section in arm branch to get complete > barebox regions in sdram regions tree. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <a.aring@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/lib/barebox.lds.S | 6 +++++- > arch/blackfin/boards/ipe337/barebox.lds.S | 6 +++++- > arch/mips/lib/barebox.lds.S | 5 ++++- > arch/nios2/cpu/barebox.lds.S | 5 +++-- > arch/ppc/boards/freescale-p2020rdb/barebox.lds.S | 6 ++++-- > arch/ppc/boards/pcm030/barebox.lds.S | 5 +++-- > arch/x86/lib/barebox.lds.S | 5 ++++- > common/memory.c | 4 ++++ > include/asm-generic/sections.h | 1 + > 9 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/barebox.lds.S b/arch/arm/lib/barebox.lds.S > index e0bae70..ae0b760 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/lib/barebox.lds.S > +++ b/arch/arm/lib/barebox.lds.S > @@ -70,7 +70,9 @@ SECTIONS > __stop_unwind_tab = .; > } > #endif > - _etext = .; /* End of text and rodata section */ > + _etext = . - 1; /* End of text and rodata section */ I am not sure this is a good idea. Looking at it this indeed seems to be correct. Anyway, at least in the Linux kernel I can find things like: codesize = (unsigned long)_etext - (unsigned long)_text; If we have _etext = . the above results in the correct codesize, but if we change this to _etext = . - 1 we would have to do codesize = (unsigned long)_etext - (unsigned long)_text + 1; instead. Everyone else including the kernel and the standard linker scripts from ld have _etext = .; so I vote for keeping it that way. > @@ -83,6 +85,8 @@ SECTIONS > __usymtab : { BAREBOX_SYMS } > ___usymtab_end = .; > > + _edata - . -1; s/-/=/ Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox