Hello Jürgen,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:04:09PM +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> > Is it worth to introduce a common function
> >
> > void __noreturn sensiblename(unsigned long clkctrl_reset_offset, unsigned
> > long unused) {
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > and make the reset_cpu functions for imx23 and imx28 just call
> > sensiblename()?
>
> Refer "http://www.spinics.net/lists/u-boot-v2/msg07681.html";
I don't see how this answers my question. To combine both answers, put
sensiblename into arch/arm/mach-mxs/common.c and the imx23 and the imx28
specific call to sensiblename into imx23.c and imx28.c respectively.
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
