On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:29:03PM +0200, esben.haabendal@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Esben Haabendal <esben.haabendal@xxxxxxxxx> > > These patches completes the iomux configuration definitions in > iomux-imx28.h, fixes a bug for PWM3 pad configuration, and fixes > support for using BITKEEPER(1) in pad configurations. > > RFC: It might be better to just get rid of the split between BITKEEPER > and PULLUP in definitions. It clearly is a source for subtle bugs > (setting PULLUP does not really do anything if the pad/function is > actually defined as a keeper pad. As for i.MX28 the reference manual > is not very clear on which pads/functions have pullup instead of > keeper, and I am not sure that the current defintions in barebox is in > sync with the manual and/or the real world. What do you think, should > I make a patch unifying PULLUP and BITKEEPER. > > Esben Haabendal (4): > mxs: Fix support for BITKEEPER() macro > mxs: Fix i.MX28 PWM3 iomux configuration > mxs: Cleanup use of blank lines in i.MX28 iomux configurations > mxs: Add remaining i.MX28 iomux configurations Applied, thanks. Sascha > > arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-imx28.h | 163 +++++++++++++++++++------- > arch/arm/mach-mxs/iomux-imx.c | 6 + > 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.7.5.4 > > > _______________________________________________ > barebox mailing list > barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
