From: Esben Haabendal <esben.haabendal@xxxxxxxxx> These patches completes the iomux configuration definitions in iomux-imx28.h, fixes a bug for PWM3 pad configuration, and fixes support for using BITKEEPER(1) in pad configurations. RFC: It might be better to just get rid of the split between BITKEEPER and PULLUP in definitions. It clearly is a source for subtle bugs (setting PULLUP does not really do anything if the pad/function is actually defined as a keeper pad. As for i.MX28 the reference manual is not very clear on which pads/functions have pullup instead of keeper, and I am not sure that the current defintions in barebox is in sync with the manual and/or the real world. What do you think, should I make a patch unifying PULLUP and BITKEEPER. Esben Haabendal (4): mxs: Fix support for BITKEEPER() macro mxs: Fix i.MX28 PWM3 iomux configuration mxs: Cleanup use of blank lines in i.MX28 iomux configurations mxs: Add remaining i.MX28 iomux configurations arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/iomux-imx28.h | 163 +++++++++++++++++++------- arch/arm/mach-mxs/iomux-imx.c | 6 + 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) -- 1.7.5.4 _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
