On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 05:54:37AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 18:58 Sun 19 Feb , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > This adds tftp filesystem support. It currently duplicates > > significant amounts of the tftp (command) support. This is ok > > since we can eventually drop the original tftp command later. > > > > tftp is not really suitable to be handled as a filesystem. It lacks > > support for stat, reading directories and other things. Handling > > it as a filesystem has one big advantage though: tftp is no special > > case for boot scripts and/or commands anymore which makes them simpler. > > > > This implementation has some improvements to the original tftp command. > > It supports blocksize negotiation which speeds up transfers if the tftp > > server supports it. Also we can determine the filesize to transfer if > > the remote end supports it. > > > look good do you have seach patch for nfs? No, everyone is invited to implement it ;) NFS is a bit more complicated than tftp though. The implementation we have lacks readdir support, so we have to figure out how to do this first. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
