On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 07:09:44AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 18:14 Fri 23 Dec , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:03:21PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > On 11:31 Mon 19 Dec , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 02:07:42PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > > HI, > > > > > > > > > > what is the impact on the binary size?? > > > > > > > > Don't know. Why should this have a great influence on binary size? > > > I mean the whole rework?? > > > > About +2k > too muck it's break a lots of my board That's the reason I made this quite configurable. > > we need to take a look to reduce the impact > > as IIRC it's more with zlib and co Yes, zlib is quite big, but you can disable it. Also, you could try the tlsf allocator, it should save you enough binary size. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
