Re: Anybody working on Samsung S3C64xx support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Myself wrote:
> is anybody working on Barebox support for the ARM11 based S3C6410 CPU from
> Samsung (just to be sure to not re-invent the wheel)?

When adding the S3C6410 CPU support: Should I try to extend the existing 
S3C24xx family (its uses an ARMv4 core) with the ARMv6 core S3C64xx family, 
or better a separate mach-* directory? Both CPUs sharing some peripherals, 
but with many little differences (known from i.MX...)

Regards,
Juergen

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                              | Juergen Beisert             |
Linux Solutions for Science and Industry      | Phone: +49-5121-206917-5128 |
Vertretung Sued/Muenchen, Germany             | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686              | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux