On 11:18 Mon 19 Sep , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:23:45PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boards/at91sam9260ek/init.c | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/boards/at91sam9263ek/init.c | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/boards/pm9263/init.c | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c | 2 +-
> > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/at91sam9260ek/init.c b/arch/arm/boards/at91sam9260ek/init.c
> > index 861e898..e4b98bf 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boards/at91sam9260ek/init.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boards/at91sam9260ek/init.c
> > @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static struct atmel_nand_data nand_pdata = {
> > .cle = 22,
> > /* .det_pin = ... not connected */
> > .ecc_base = (void __iomem *)(AT91_BASE_SYS + AT91_ECC),
> > - .ecc_mode = NAND_ECC_HW,
> > + .ecc_mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT,
>
> What does the Atmel nand bootloader expect (I assume it's possible to
> boot from NAND, right?). Is it software or hardware ecc?
don't care the ecc is not manage by the rom code
Best Regards,
J.
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
