On 18:12 Mon 01 Aug , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 17:54 Mon 01 Aug , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 03:26:43PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > This series reworks the barebox MMU support. We now use second > > > level page tables which allows us to remap the dma coherent area > > > dynamically. We don't have to map our sdram twice anymore which > > > helps us on newer systems with big memory. > > > > > > As a bonus there is no board specific MMU code anymore. All a board > > > has to do to enable MMU support via Kconfig is to register its SDRAM banks > > > at mem_initcall > > > > > > The following changes since commit b821d73607cc6387b1ee588af97a44e8eb2b4fe2: > > > > > > Merge branch 'resource' of git://uboot.jcrosoft.org/barebox into next (2011-08-01 14:10:38 +0200) > > > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > > > git://uboot.jcrosoft.org/barebox.git mmu > > > > > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (2): > > > arm: introduce arm_add_mem_device to register dram device > > > init: introduce mem, mmu and postmmu initcall > > > > > > Sascha Hauer (7): > > > ARM cache l2x0: depend on MMU > > > ARM: move armlinux_add_dram to location which is always compiled > > > ARM l2x0: make init function static inline if l2 is not available > > > ARM: pass size to dma_free_coherent > > > ARM boards: move sdram setup before mmu setup > > > ARM: rework MMU support > > > ARM boards: remove now unnecessary mmu calls > > > > merged up to 7/9. The MMU rework needs some changes to v1 which I > > haven't posted yet. It does not work correctly on armv7 as these > > processors need slightly different second level page table entries. > > > > Also, I added the appropriate KEEP directives to > > include/asm-generic/barebox.lds.h to make this branch work. Would be > > good if you could give your patches at least *some* testing. > I've no armv7 availlable work fine > > I test it on at91 and s3c and versatile work fine > > but no mmu yet > and I compiled all ARM > did'nt see the missing KEEP as I'm working on a really small version of barebox with nothing inside to go done to less than 26K Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox