On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:08:53AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:58:34PM +0400, Alexey Zaytsev wrote: > > 2011/7/4 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 07:13:47AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> ./arch/arm/mach-versatile/include/mach/debug_ll.h > > >> Can you put this file under gpl v2 or later > > >> > > >> Barebox is GPLv2 Only project > > > INAL, but I think this is not a problem. Barebox itself just doesn't > > > make use of the possibility to use a later version of the GPL. Still you > > > can pick that file out of barebox and use it in a GPL v3 project. > > > > > > But maybe I just didn't get what you intended with your mail. > > > > This is a problem. If some files are gpl 2 only, and others are gpl 3 > > only, you can't distribute the result, as the licenses are not > > compatible. > We're not talking about "gpl v3 only" (or "v3 or later") here. Including a > "v2 or later" header in a "v2 only" .c file should be no problem. Ah, OK, I misread Jean-Christophe's question "Can you put this file under gpl v2 or later" as "Is currently put under gpl v2 or later". Sorry for the noise, Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
