2011/7/4 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:58:34PM +0400, Alexey Zaytsev wrote: >> 2011/7/4 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 07:13:47AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> ./arch/arm/mach-versatile/include/mach/debug_ll.h >> >> Can you put this file under gpl v2 or later >> >> >> >> Barebox is GPLv2 Only project >> > INAL, but I think this is not a problem. Barebox itself just doesn't >> > make use of the possibility to use a later version of the GPL. Still you >> > can pick that file out of barebox and use it in a GPL v3 project. >> > >> > But maybe I just didn't get what you intended with your mail. >> >> This is a problem. If some files are gpl 2 only, and others are gpl 3 >> only, you can't distribute the result, as the licenses are not >> compatible. > We're not talking about "gpl v3 only" (or "v3 or later") here. Including a > "v2 or later" header in a "v2 only" .c file should be no problem. Check the original message. The header in question was gplv3, probably by a mistake. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
