On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 05:28:54AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 14:58 Sat 20 Nov , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > On 14:40 Sat 20 Nov , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:30:09PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > On 09:00 Fri 19 Nov , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > > Hi J, > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 07:18:54PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > > > introdude also some helper to manager them > > > > > > > > > > > > and add multi resource per device support > > > > > > > > > > > > ram device: use resource structure instead of memory_platform_data > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You shouldn't use a resource_size_t type to access registers. This will > > > > > lead to problems when we start to support 64bit resource sizes > > > > no as resource_size_t is 64 bit aware > > > > > > And exactly this is the problem. void * is usually only 32bit on arm. > > > This will lead to compiler warnings and sparse isn't happy about > > > unsigned long in readl/writel anyway. > > IIRC on arm resource_size_t is never 64bit at least on the current ARMvx Think of MMC/SD cards > 4G. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
