Hi Marek, On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:20:47PM +0100, Belisko Marek wrote: > Hi, > > barebox compilation with C=1 produce a lot of sparse warnings. > Mainly concerning __iomem problems with readb() and similar functions. > > Make it sense to take care or just could be omitted? I think it makes sense to work on this. Then we can see the useful warnings buried under the __iomem warnings. I had the idea of adding a #define IOMEM(addr) ((void __force __iomem *)(addr)) and use it where appropriate. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
