On 09:03 Mon 02 Nov , Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:50:46AM +0100, Alessandro Rubini wrote: > > I'm sorry, I don't understand. I swear bool true and false should > > never be part of a sane C program. > > > > It's misleading, as people tend to write "if (x == true)" which is > > almost always wrong. I didn't expect such definitions to be in a new > > sane project like V2. > > Seconded - we should simply use the usual semantics from the kernel. > > I assume Jean has copied the sniplet from linux - it is in types.h there > as well. However, we should change the code to be sane. yes it's correct for this patch I just intend to have the kernel semantic but I agree with you alessandro we need to clean the "true" stuff also Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ u-boot-v2 mailing list u-boot-v2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/u-boot-v2
