On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > Patrick Vervoorn <patrick.vervoorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Michael Schuster wrote: > >>> This mailing list has become a conduit for unfiltered spam. There is >>> minimal to no topical activity, and there don't appear to be any >>> administrative controls to keep out spam. Is anyone listening? > >> Yup. ;) > > Even on-topic messages like this one have advertising messages appended to > them, outrageous considering what Sourceforge was supposed to be about. It's a bit sloppy to say the least... >> I'm still here, even using trn, though it is getting more and more >> unstable as time goes by. Using 'valgrind' I also notice trn is quite >> sloppy with (de-)allocating it's memory... > >> Anyway, anyone still here who is actively maintaining trn? > > As the last test release was more than 7 years ago... Yeah, I know, nothing much has happened. I badly hacked the sources a few times since that release to get it working (again/faster/better). It's too bad there's no real alternative; I've tried slrn, but that's also not it. Are there any people on this list who found a 'worthy' alternative to trn? Regards, Patrick. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
