On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Colin Watson wrote: > Hi, > > As I said in the last bug I forwarded, I don't do much extracting of > binaries from trn so I'm not really qualified to comment on this. What > do people here think of the suggested new BADCHARS default? > - I think it's a bad idea, if it can be interpreted by the shell it should not be in a filename that you download over the internet. The BADCHARS list was created from experience with the kind of exploits common when trn was under active development, I see no reason to let the door open again. Let all the people that want to shoot themselves in the foot use Explorer... _ Booker C. Bense ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf
