On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:25 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I thought the retention of RCU locking was reasonable, and that your
> feedback was something I disagreed with.
>
> This is different from ignoring your feedback.
The point is we don't need to backport the patch that far, as I already
mentioned, up to commit c15b1ccadb323ea
("ipv6: move DAD and addrconf_verify processing to workqueue"),
simply because no one reports any bug.
So we don't have to adjust the patch just for stable in this case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe trinity" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
