On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What games are you playing? You know how patches are processed by David > and I even let him the choice by pointing out a problem in your patch so > that you could an update and send v2. I assume David goes over all the discussion before applying any patch. So in the original discussion, obviously I disagree with your point on RCU, and sent my own version. I do understand David may miss something due to massive emails in this list, but you make no point here nor I understand your broken English "let him the choice...". > > I really feel miffed about your behavior! > I SEE. Please do redirect my email to your /dev/null. Thanks a lot! > Anyway, I saw the hunk adding the return -ENODEV and didn't see any > problems with it. Sure it might be better if it would gone into a > separate patch. Can you elaborate what problems you see? > Yes, it should be not in this patch at the very very least. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe trinity" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
