[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 10:25:14 +0200
> 
> > 
> > * David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >> Please don't mix networking and non-networking changes into a patch
> >> series.
> > 
> > As explained in 0/5 the networking fix justifies the first 4 patches. The 
> > networking fix is independent of the first 4 patches.
> > 
> >> Submit the networking patch to netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > He Cc:-ed the patch to netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. If you agree with it then 
> > the fix should probably be picked up ASAP.
> 
> He submitted it as part of a series which implies that it belongs together
> with the others.

And then described it in the 0/5 patch that it's not. It's also visible 
from the title, the changelog and the diff of the 5/5 patch that it's a 
separate fix.

So please consider it submitted.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe trinity" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux