[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 10:25:14 +0200

> 
> * David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Please don't mix networking and non-networking changes into a patch
>> series.
> 
> As explained in 0/5 the networking fix justifies the first 4 patches. The 
> networking fix is independent of the first 4 patches.
> 
>> Submit the networking patch to netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> He Cc:-ed the patch to netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. If you agree with it then 
> the fix should probably be picked up ASAP.

He submitted it as part of a series which implies that it belongs together
with the others.

If it does not, he should submit it seperately.

If they belong together, then the entire series should be CC:'d to netdev
so that networking developers can see all of the context and participate
in the patches that the networking "enables".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe trinity" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux