Re: Speaking of flatpak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 19 May 2024 18.21:47 dep via tde-users wrote:

> As I said, it seems ceteris paribus better than flatpak, though I could be
> wrong.

I confess having no knowledge of the internas of all these. I tend to prefer 
installing from teh repositories, but Appimages and Flatpak solve some 
dependency problems, and I have the (wrong?) feeling teht installing them 
does not "polute" my distribution.

I rely on OpenBoard for example at work. These is (was?) a package for Ubuntu, 
that would not install on Debian (as often). They don't have appimage, but 
Flatpak works great. The Prusa Slicer commes as Appimage and works too.

So I'm a little like Japanese with Bhudism and Shinto: I use one or the other 
depending on my needs at the moment...

There's a third sort of such things, snap, but it requires systemd, seems, and 
I'm not running it so... 
____________________________________________________
tde-users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web mail archive available at https://mail.trinitydesktop.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Trinity Devel]     [KDE]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]     [Trinity Desktop Environment]

  Powered by Linux