On Sunday 29 April 2018 02:27:33 Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote: > Am Sonntag, 29. April 2018 schrieb deloptes: > > In my opinion the PGPG support in KMail is pretty sufficient to enable > > secure communication with any recipient. > > Why would you bother paying for something you already have? > > > > I ask myself if you clearly understand the concept of encrypted mails? > > > > regards > > The point of protinmail - as I see it - was an email address, that could > not be associated with a real person. But protonmail changed the initial > user authentication to require a handy or some other identifyable device, > so the main purpose is gone. > > But what I miss in kamil+PGPG is an encrypted mail-subject, e.g "Subject: > Re: more re. tde and qt5" beeing replaced by a random > string, which gets replaced on the receiver side with an embedded subject > from within the encrypted mail. Reason is, that a lot of users use a > subject that tells a lot about the mail content, at least enough to let it > be sorted in "interesting" or "junk". > > Nik Another good point! Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
