Am Sonntag, 29. April 2018 schrieb deloptes: > In my opinion the PGPG support in KMail is pretty sufficient to enable > secure communication with any recipient. > Why would you bother paying for something you already have? > > I ask myself if you clearly understand the concept of encrypted mails? > > regards The point of protinmail - as I see it - was an email address, that could not be associated with a real person. But protonmail changed the initial user authentication to require a handy or some other identifyable device, so the main purpose is gone. But what I miss in kamil+PGPG is an encrypted mail-subject, e.g "Subject: Re: more re. tde and qt5" beeing replaced by a random string, which gets replaced on the receiver side with an embedded subject from within the encrypted mail. Reason is, that a lot of users use a subject that tells a lot about the mail content, at least enough to let it be sorted in "interesting" or "junk". Nik -- Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA, CIA ... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
