dep composed on 2017-07-26 19:47 (UTC-0400): > while i'm here -- there was talk that there was something wrong with 16.04 > and that 14.04 was preferable. as my current situation demonstrates, i'm > not a big fan of upgrading distributions, and going only to 14.04 means i > get to do this all over again in two years. so -- have the issues with > 16.04 been ironed out, or is it still to be avoided? Are you sure the problem with 16.04 wasn't about KDE users upgrading from a mature KDE4 to a buggy Plasma 5 rather than 14.04LTS itself? What does Ubuntu offer a TDE user over the Debian base on which Ubuntu is based anyway? Is going straight from 12.04 to 16.04 even supported? To keep trouble to a minimum or nil probably requires going to 14.04 first. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
