On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 07:03:52PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>
> On 9/6/22 10:45 AM, Dmitry Bogdanov wrote:
> > +
> > +static ssize_t core_tpg_rtpi_store(struct config_item *item,
> > + const char *page, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + struct se_portal_group *se_tpg = attrib_to_tpg(item);
> > + struct se_portal_group *tpg;
> > + bool rtpi_changed = false;
> > + u16 val;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = kstrtou16(page, 0, &val);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + if (val == 0)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + /* RTPI shouldn't conflict with values of existing ports */
> > + spin_lock(&g_tpg_lock);
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(tpg, &g_tpg_list, tpg_list) {
> > + if (se_tpg != tpg && val == tpg->tpg_rtpi) {
> > + spin_unlock(&g_tpg_lock);
> > + pr_err("TARGET_CORE[%s]->TPG[%u] - RTPI %#x conflicts with TARGET_CORE[%s]->TPG[%u]\n",
> > + se_tpg->se_tpg_tfo->fabric_name,
> > + se_tpg->se_tpg_tfo->tpg_get_tag(tpg),
> > + val,
> > + tpg->se_tpg_tfo->fabric_name,
> > + tpg->se_tpg_tfo->tpg_get_tag(tpg));
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (se_tpg->tpg_rtpi != val) {
> > + se_tpg->tpg_rtpi = val;
> > + rtpi_changed = true;
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock(&g_tpg_lock);
> > +
> > + if (rtpi_changed)
> > + core_tpg_ua(se_tpg, 0x3f, ASCQ_3FH_INQUIRY_DATA_HAS_CHANGED);
> > + ret = count;
> > +
> > + return ret;
>
> Just return count.
Yes, will do.
