On 9/6/22 10:45 AM, Dmitry Bogdanov wrote: > + > +static ssize_t core_tpg_rtpi_store(struct config_item *item, > + const char *page, size_t count) > +{ > + struct se_portal_group *se_tpg = attrib_to_tpg(item); > + struct se_portal_group *tpg; > + bool rtpi_changed = false; > + u16 val; > + int ret; > + > + ret = kstrtou16(page, 0, &val); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + if (val == 0) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + /* RTPI shouldn't conflict with values of existing ports */ > + spin_lock(&g_tpg_lock); > + > + list_for_each_entry(tpg, &g_tpg_list, tpg_list) { > + if (se_tpg != tpg && val == tpg->tpg_rtpi) { > + spin_unlock(&g_tpg_lock); > + pr_err("TARGET_CORE[%s]->TPG[%u] - RTPI %#x conflicts with TARGET_CORE[%s]->TPG[%u]\n", > + se_tpg->se_tpg_tfo->fabric_name, > + se_tpg->se_tpg_tfo->tpg_get_tag(tpg), > + val, > + tpg->se_tpg_tfo->fabric_name, > + tpg->se_tpg_tfo->tpg_get_tag(tpg)); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + } > + > + if (se_tpg->tpg_rtpi != val) { > + se_tpg->tpg_rtpi = val; > + rtpi_changed = true; > + } > + spin_unlock(&g_tpg_lock); > + > + if (rtpi_changed) > + core_tpg_ua(se_tpg, 0x3f, ASCQ_3FH_INQUIRY_DATA_HAS_CHANGED); > + ret = count; > + > + return ret; Just return count.