Re: [PATCH 02/10] target/core: Use kvcalloc() instead of open-coding it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 13:54 +-0100, David Disseldorp wrote:
+AD4 Looks reasonable. Any reason for dropping the extra +AF8AXw-GFP flags?

Hi David,

What makes you think that I dropped any of the +AF8AXw-GFP flags? The only purpose
of the +AF8AXw-GFP+AF8-NOWARN and +AF8AXw-GFP+AF8-RETRY+AF8-MAYFAIL flags is to make kcalloc() fail
quickly and silently. I'm not dropping these flags: as one can see in the
kvmalloc+AF8-node() implementation that function passes these flags to
kmalloc+AF8-node(). The source code I'm referring to is available in mm/util.c.

Bart.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux