Re: [PATCH 02/10] target/core: Use kvcalloc() instead of open-coding it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] target/core: Use kvcalloc() instead of open-coding it
From: David Disseldorp <ddiss@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:54:50 +0100
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Christie <mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20181106171718.89594-3-bvanassche@acm.org>
References: <20181106171718.89594-1-bvanassche@acm.org> <20181106171718.89594-3-bvanassche@acm.org>

Looks reasonable. Any reason for dropping the extra __GFP flags?

Either way...
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@xxxxxxx>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] target/core: Use kvcalloc() instead of open-coding it
  - From: Bart Van Assche

References:
- [PATCH 00/10] Make ABORT and LUN RESET handling synchronous
  - From: Bart Van Assche
- [PATCH 02/10] target/core: Use kvcalloc() instead of open-coding it
  - From: Bart Van Assche

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/10] target/tcmu: Fix queue_cmd_ring() declaration
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/10] target/core: Use kvcalloc() instead of open-coding it
Previous by thread: [PATCH 02/10] target/core: Use kvcalloc() instead of open-coding it
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/10] target/core: Use kvcalloc() instead of open-coding it
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux SCSI] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux