Re: [PATCH v2 19/36] target: Make ABORT and LUN RESET handling synchronous

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 15:09 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Listen, my primary concern is the integrity of the code-paths that has
> taken us years to get stable.

If that would be true you would have taken this patch series upstream two
years ago, when I posted this patch series for the first time. This patch
series namely makes the SCSI target core much more reliable and much easier
to maintain. However, instead of helping to make this patch series make
progress two years ago you chose to obstruct this work and to increase the
complexity of the target core further. You still have a chance to show that
reliability and maintainability of the target core is your primary concern
by posting review comments for v4 of the patch series I posted.

Bart.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux