On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 11:06 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Adding a second atomic_t emulating a kref on top of the existing > se_cmd->cmd_kref, and then doing a complete_all() for the special TMR > path in the normal fast-path is not going to be acceptable. I don't see why that approach would not be acceptable. My patches remove more atomic operations than the number of new atomic operations that are introduced in the hot path so these patches will improve performance. Bart.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
