On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Sagi, are you going to spin an increment in the initiator version? > >> I don't know if it's worth a driver version update? > > yes, I think it does. Finally we're getting real close to the visions > of the spec authors... do you have some performance data showing the > gain of remote invalidation on certain HWs and IO benchmarks patterns. > Did we make sure to interoperate between patched initiator to > unpatched LIO or other targets which don't have this now (SCST, TGT) > and the other way around (unpatched initiator, patched LIO)? Sagi? >> In case we do increment, I can send an incremental patch instead of >> re-spinning the entire series. > > lets do that. lets -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
