On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Sagi, are you going to spin an increment in the initiator version? > I don't know if it's worth a driver version update? yes, I think it does. Finally we're getting real close to the visions of the spec authors... do you have some performance data showing the gain of remote invalidation on certain HWs and IO benchmarks patterns. Did we make sure to interoperate between patched initiator to unpatched LIO or other targets which don't have this now (SCST, TGT) and the other way around (unpatched initiator, patched LIO)? > In case we do increment, I can send an incremental patch instead of > re-spinning the entire series. lets do that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
