On 11/17/2015 11:35 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
On 11/16/2015 6:37 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
This is a pre-step before adding remote invalidate support.
Wouldn't that introduce performance regression on ConnectX3 devices?
With remote invalidate it shouldn't make much of a difference.
Why? the invalidate is just one part of the story, we are doing a
mapping on IO submission
and CX3 has strong ordering on FRWRs, right?
Plus, I'd really like us to start phasing out from FMRs...
We should make sure not to introduce performance regression for HW which
has
such a big existing install base and is well selling in 2015/16
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
