Re: Performance issue with O_DIRECT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 22:24 +0200, Dragan Milivojević wrote:
> > The throughput you're seeing with a single LUN + iodepth=1 + 1 Gb/sec is
> > expected behavior.
> >
> > In order to saturate a 1 Gb/sec link, more outstanding I/Os need to be
> > kept in flight (iodepth > 1) or a larger payload needs to be utilized.
> 
> I just did a quick calculation (which I should have done before
> writing this email)
> If a total latency of a system is 1ms theoretical bandwidth comes down
> to 1000 * 64K
> which is around the figure I'm getting in the benchmarks. Little math
> goes a long way :)
> I should have done in the beginning and not waste this much time.
> This should be in a wiki :)
> 
> Thansk and sorry for wasting your time.
> 

No worries.  Thanks again for reporting the MSFT regression bug!

--nab

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux