Hi Andy, On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:51AM, Andy Grover wrote: > I think it can go. But why don't we keep this patch just about making the > common function (not changing anything) and we can remove this in a separate > patch against for-next in the near future? I'll make a note to do this. Agreed, let's keep that for now since this patch series is addressed against v4.1 and we can change it later on. With that said, this patch series looks good to me too. Thanks for these patches! Cheers, Ilias
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
