On 05/11/2015 11:40 PM, Andy Grover wrote:
On 05/11/2015 02:05 PM, Jerome Martin wrote:
On 04/22/2015 10:01 PM, Andy Grover wrote:
On 04/22/2015 12:46 AM, Christophe Vu-Brugier wrote:
What about removing backstores/user and prefixing the user-backed
backstores names:
+-- backstores
|-- block
|-- fileio
|-- pscsi
|-- ramdisk
|-- user:file
+-- user:glfs
Sure, we could do this. It lets the user clearly know e.g. glfs is
userspace-backed, but still suggests the user can configure it the same
way as the built-in backstores.
What about using something that makes it explicit, like:
|-- file (externally managed)
or something to that effect?
We could put that in the summary (over on the right) but the actual node
names are paths that people can "cd" into, so we probably want to limit
what we put there, no?
Oh yes, obviously. Sorry, the formatting within the email reply was not
up to the task, but this is what I meant.
As for the names themselves, I think Christophe suggestion of using a
prefix makes sense to prevent possible name clashes with the regular
backstores, unless you can guarantee that this cannot happen?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
