Re: targetcli and user-backed backstores, advice?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/22/2015 12:46 AM, Christophe Vu-Brugier wrote:
What about removing backstores/user and prefixing the user-backed
backstores names:

+-- backstores
     |-- block
     |-- fileio
     |-- pscsi
     |-- ramdisk
     |-- user:file
     +-- user:glfs

Sure, we could do this. It lets the user clearly know e.g. glfs is userspace-backed, but still suggests the user can configure it the same way as the built-in backstores.

-- Andy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux