On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 17:52 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 03:00:46PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > Just a heads up that I've got a ~20 part series in target-rcu-wip to > > convert se_node_acl->device_list[] access to RCU, along with a number of > > other cleanups along with the long overdue renaming of core_tpg_* + > > core_dev_* to target_* prefixes. > > > > This patch most certainly conflicts with that series.. Any chance to > > rebase this against target-rcu-wip..? > > Seems rather pointless to rebase it on the renames, which are the only > part affected. I'd prefer to merge this patch ASAP So I was going to just merge this because having a single register template function for fabric drivers does make alot of sense, but it currently conflicts with the T10-PI fabric bits in for-next. Sigh.. Looking further, I really don't like how the target_fabric_copy_attrs() stuff works in target_register_template(). Just punting to direct use struct configfs_attributes pointers in target_core_fabric_ops is a hack. I'd much rather see target_fabric_setup_cits() do this proper setup, instead of unnecessarily duplicating the target_core_fabric_configfs.c list of defined config_item_types in two new locations. --nab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
