On 03/30/2015 12:21 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:16:04PM -0700, Andy Grover wrote:
I dug my patches up and rebased on top of target-pending/for-next. Pushed
here:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/grover/linux.git
mar30-dynalloc-deve
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/grover/linux.git/log/?h=mar30-dynalloc-deve
if this is helpful for your efforts.
See the branch above, it does everything your old series did except
for dynamic allocation of the LUNs, although it gets there through a
different way.
And you got rid of the redundant LUNFLAGS_READ_WRITE flag too, nice.
So what's next? Were you going to do the LUNs too? In addition to +perf
and less mem usage, going down this path also leads to >256 LUNs per tpg.
Woot! -- Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
