On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 11:22 -0700, Andy Grover wrote: > Hi all, > > As Gris brings up here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838759 > > do we also want to disallow (or at least warn) when the user attempts to > map a storageobject to an initiator more than once? I would definately go for a warn over a fail. > What is the use case > for an initiator needing a lu available via more than 1 lun? Not a type customer case, but useful for testing multipath on the same session if no more HW ports are available. > The only > parameter difference is write_protect=rw or ro and lu number, should we > disallow if write_protect and base lu matches an existing mapping? Thoughts? > Leaning to warning over fail for this particular user ex scenario (jxm CC'ed) Thanks Andy! --nab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
