On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 06:54 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > There is no need to make task_state_active an atomic_t given that it is > always set under the execute_task_lock so we can make it a simple bool. > Also rename it to t_state_active to be closer to the list it guards, > and make sure all checks before the list addion/removal actually happen > under execute_task_lock. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > Applied, and will get these queued for v3.2-rc this week. Thanks Christoph! --nab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
