Re: iblock vs fileio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 05:03:52PM -0800, Andy Grover wrote:
> Hi Nick and all,
> 
> Fileio backstore appears to be able to also use block devices directly.
> This is a duplication of iblock, except iblock is using the async
> submit_bio() instead of blocking vfs_readv/writev calls.
> 
> Is one of these going to be generally better than the other, so maybe we
> could drop one?
> 
> If not, what's the guidance for how users should pick between the two
> backstores?

If you use a block device use iblock - it's generall going to be a lot
faster and more efficient.  If you want to use regular files use the
file backend.  That naming should make it kinda obvious, except for the
weird "i" in iblock that still keeps confusing me.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux