On Mon, 21 November 2011 14:38:59 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 16:29 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Nevermind that the whole session linkage should really move to a > > different lock ASAP anyway. > > I think doing this makes sense now.. I'm still finishing up a few other > qla_tgt-3.3 related items atm, but will look at getting this separated > out over the next days. Good! I'm currently doing the same in a backlevel kernel, as contention for ha->hardware_lock can take up to 15% of our cpu time. Having to duplicate the effort sucks, but getting regressions when next upgrading the kernel would suck even more. So I'm happy to see the hardware lock become a plain hardware lock again. :) Jörn -- When you close your hand, you own nothing. When you open it up, you own the whole world. -- Li Mu Bai in Tiger & Dragon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
